Resumo
For several decades, technical limitations discouraged the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of diseases of the chest cavity. However, recent technological advances have made it possible to overcome these challenges, and MRI is currently recognized for offering numerous advantages in chest imaging, such as high resolution, soft tissue contrast and the possibility of functional assessment of the lung and thoracic masses. In this study, the main indications for chest MRI in patients diagnosed with malignancy and its relevant role in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions and in the detection of metastases are described, aiming to identify the main indications and findings of chest MRI and its impact on clinical management of an oncology center. This is a single-center, retrospective, analytical study carried out by reviewing the medical records of all patients diagnosed with cancer undergoing chest MRI at the Department of Images of the AC Camargo Cancer Center from January 2014 to December 2016. The main indication for chest MRI was post-treatment follow-up. Chest MRI was most frequently requested by the Departments of Thoracic Surgery and Clinical Oncology. In most cases, chest MRI results led to maintenance of the current treatment plan rather than a change in management. Magnetic resonance imaging has several applications in the assessment of the chest and can be used by different specialties and subspecialties. In the present study, it was concluded that chest MRI was most frequently used for post-treatment follow-up, and the most common response to MRI findings was to continue current treatment.
Referências
Torre L A, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. 2015; 00:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262
Puderbach M, Hintze C, Ley S, et al. MR imaging of the chest: A practical approach at 1.5T. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 64:345-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.009
Biederer J, Beer M, Hirsch W, et al. MRI of the lung (2/3). Why ...when ...how? Insights Imaging 2012; 3:355–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0146-8
Carter BW, Gladish GW. MR Imaging of Chest Wall Tumors. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015; 23:197–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2015.01.007
Guimaraes MD, Schuch A, Hochhegger B, et al. Ressonância magnética funcional na oncologia: estado da arte. Radiol Bras 2014; 47:101-111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842014000200013
Hochhegger B, Souza VVS, Marchiori E, et al. Chest magnetic resonance imaging: a protocol suggestion. Radiol Bras 2015; 48:373-80. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0017
Barreto MM, Rafful PP, Rodrigues RS, et al. Correlation between computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings of parenchymal lung diseases. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:492–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.037
Lee CU, White DB, Sykes AMG, et al. Establishing a chest MRI practice and its clinical applications: our insight and protocols. J Clin Imaging Sci 2014; 4:17 https://doi.org/10.4103%2F2156-7514.129288
Boiselle PM, Biederer J, Gefter WB, et al. Expert opinion: why is MRI still an underutilized modality for evaluating thoracic disorders? J Thorac Imaging 2013; 28:137. https://doi.org/10.1097/rti.0b013e31828cafe7
Ackman JB. MR imaging of mediastinal masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015; 23:141-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2015.01.002
Squizzato A, Pomero F, Allione A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: A bivariate meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2017;154:64-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2017.03.027
Revel MP, O. Sanchez, S. Couchon, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonar embolism: results of the ‘IRM-EP’ study, J. Thromb. Haemost. 10 (2012) 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04652.x
Koyama H, Ohno Y, Seki S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for lung cancer. J Thorac Imag 2013; 28:138–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000210
Cieszanowski A, Lisowska A, Dabrowska M, et al. MR imaging of pulmonary nodules: detection rate and accuracy of size estimation in comparison to computed tomography. PloS One 2016 Jun 3;11(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156272
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Ensino, Ciência e Inovação em Saúde